This summary contains my opinions as well as facts about the film footage. If you don't like that or feel I don't have a right to express my opinions don't bother to read on.
 
   It is necessary that a copy of the video be examined and the pictures in this summary be used only as a guide.  
 		 
* * *
  One inconsistency that occurs between reels of the autopsy footage and that is fairly easy to see is a blood streak or drip that shows up at the lower edge of the abdominal incision. In this frame from reel #61 we see the drip just starting to form. This is the reel that contains the sequence of the doctor removing an opaque looking object from the chest area.
 
 
     In the following frame we see the drip has gotten longer. That would indicate that the above frame was filmed before the this frame.
 
 
       The second frame is from what is labeled Reel #59, the sequence showing the body filleted open and the body cavity full of organs.

So it would appear that these two reels are out of order.

        (It is important to look at these in the autopsy movie so that you see the content of the reels and the context that these stills are in. The camera operator moves around the body during the filming so that these streaks can be seen from different angles. This makes it clear that it isn't a matter of the streaks being washed out by poor image quality.)     On reel #62 the streak appears to be long as the following frame shows. This reel contains the removal of the eye coverings and shows a mostly empty body cavity.
 

 
     It would then seem that only reels #59 and #61 are out of order.  There is further evidence that reel #59 was filmed after reel #61 but it is much more difficult to see without enhancements.

    The smudges that appear at the lower edge of the reflected skin seem to be missing in reel #61, and reappear in the later reels.
 

 
    The smudges however are difficult to see, whereas the longer streak is quite visible by simply watching the movie.

   This is not a matter of the reels just being numbered incorrectly. It is the sequence of events that appear on those reels that are significant.
 
   In a real autopsy it would have been impossible to film reel #61 before reel #59.  Impossible because the dissection would have to have started with an empty body cavity, then was filled up.  Yet this appears to be exactly what happened here and is the only way the blood marks could be consistent.

   An autopsy using a special effects dummy,  would begin with a hollow body, then would be filled after it is cut open.  (for further information see Trey Stokes' "How to make an Alien Autopsy www.trudang.com )

   This inconsistency in blood streaks occurs on all versions of the autopsy footage that I checked, except those that have this area pixelized. It shows up much better when watching the autopsy movie than it does on paper or in just looking at a few still frames.

   One of the explanations for the disappearing and reappearing drips was that the doctor may have wiped them away as he was working and then it dripped again. This would certainly be plausible and believable if it were only the drips on the body.
 

Continue?
 
 Return to Introduction